Advanced Developmental Psychology (PSY 620-O), Spring 2024
Tuesday, Thursday 9:30AM - 10:45AM, FLP 302 and remotely
Department of Psychology, University of Miami
Course Objectives. To provide you with a) a critical understanding of current developmental theories, methods, and research; b) an ability to present, critique, and defend developmental research; and c) the capacity to address questions in developmental science by integrating research results.
Course Description: The course is designed to involve you in developmental science. Multiple topics in developmental psychology will be covered through lecture, discussion, and student presentations. They are organized into four sections: 1) developmental theories, methodologies and conceptualizations of the biological and cultural processes that influence development; 2) specific domains of development (perceptual, cognitive, language, social/emotional); 3) socialization processes including parent, peer, school, and community influences on development; 4) emerging adulthood, parenting, and aging. Emphasis will be placed on understanding development—the emergence of the new—over the lifespan.
Format. I will introduce key concepts, issues, and lines of research. You are expected to take an active role in discussing and developing topics. Everyone is expected to complete all assigned readings and actively contribute to discussion.
Required Readings: Readings are chosen to provide exposure to the theory, methods, and findings of current developmental research. One article will be assigned for each class. Of the articles listed, the presenting student will choose between them (there may be relevant articles listed on previous or subsequent days). You are not responsible for additional readings on the syllabus but exam questions may ask you to integrate material from these additional readings. Readings are linked to this syllabus.
Facilitating Discussion:
Presentations. Students will be responsible for presenting an article and facilitating class discussion X times during the semester. Your presentation should cover the article’s unique contribution, integrative themes across the readings (particularly for that day), the pros and cons of different research methods for addressing the topic, and ideas regarding potential future directions/applications of the findings. You should be familiar with the entire PowerPoint presentation for that day and be prepared to field questions and lead discussion integrating the article you are presenting with other content. The presentation and discussion cannot exceed 20 minutes.
Evaluation. Presentations will be evaluated based on a) the clarity of your presentation and slides, b) your understanding of the article (e.g., adequacy of responses to questions), c) the depth of your communicated understanding of the issues raised by the article (e.g., what is the unique message of the article), and d) the quality of the ensuing discussion (e.g., relationship to ongoing class themes), which includes a leadership role in that day’s discussion. Hallmarks of quality involve identifying strengths of the article, weaknesses, and specific, article-pertinent ideas for addressing those weaknesses. Weaker presentations often focus on common methodologic weaknesses without identifying solutions. Stronger presentations often focus on key strengths and results.
Slides. Your presentations should use Power-Point slides. I prefer figure-based presentations where the title of each slide is communicative (e.g., not “Results”) and slide titles do not repeat. I prefer large text (> 24 font). In some instances, online slides exist with which to present your article. As needed, please edit the slides and/or create new slides. If you create new slides, please put your last name in the footer section of the slide (it’s your work). The new slides—only send the slides you will be presenting—will be due by email 12 hours before class. If you feel comfortable doing so, I suggest you email the slides not only to me but to all members of the class.
Feedback. I am available to discuss articles before your presentation. We can discuss elements of the article that are difficult to understand, and your questions about what is most important to present, and how it should be presented. In other words, if there is something about the article you are planning to present that you don't understand, come discuss it with me beforehand.
Participation. Participation refers to your level of engagement in class. Participation includes attendance, having clearly done the required reading, asking pertinent questions, offering informed responses to questions, and constructive debate. Use of electronic devices for anything except class work is prohibited. Attendance is mandatory. An optional form of participation is electronic (written) communication of your reactions to the day’s reading before class. This would be an email praising, critiquing, or riffing on the article.
Midterm Exam. Distributed Mar 3 and due Mar 10 (20 points).
Final Exam. Distributed May 5 and due May 12, 11:00 pm (30 points).
Final project. For the final project, choose a question which can be addressed from a developmental perspective emphasizing change over time. It can be grounded in your research or can be an exploration of developmental themes unrelated to your work. The paper must constitute new work. Any relation with ongoing work (for another class or one’s own research) must be stated in all final project assignments. I’m available to discuss all aspects of the final project, and suggest final project ideas. If no final project can be found, I can furnish a midterm and final in its stead.
Collaborative proposals and presentations are allowed. They must include a significant component of individual work for each collaborator and must result in a proportionately higher quality final project (e.g., 2 people could collaborate on a RO1 proposal). In that case, each team member will independently submit their assignments.
The project should take one of the following forms.
1) An empirical study in the form of a journal submission (10-25 double spaced pages). This is an ideal format for completing an ongoing research project.
2) A
NIH F31/R03, NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, or comparable proposal to which I agree. This is an ideal format for exploring ideas by proposing developmental research. The final paper should include all substantive areas of the proposal (5 – 6 single-spaced pages).
3) A publication-quality literature review in summary-article format or chapter format (i.e., organized by theme, not by article (10-25 double spaced pages).
Final project assignments. For each date below, be prepared to discuss your assignment in class. If some feature of the assignment is missing in one of these assignments, and I do not draw your attention to its absence, this does not constitute license to omit that portion of the assignment.